Search Firms Must Innovate, But Will They?

search-execThis is my third recession in the staffing business, and this one is different.  The search business has arrived at what Andy Grove would call a  ”strategic inflection point” – where the fundamentals of its’ business are about to change.   Costs simply must come down, way down.  I saw alot of search firm repositioning in the last recession – mostly tinkering with their pricing models, but not fundamentally changing  who they hire and how they deliver services. 

The largest search firms got crushed in the last recession – some laying off 40% of their staff.  Of course they got into trouble because they gorged on the dot com bubble.  But they learned their lesson, right?  Wrong.   Good times returned and then they used the same inefficient business model to gorge on the financial services bubble and surprise!  now they are now laying off again.  Note to my investment advisor:  The next time any major national search firm earns a third of their revenue from any business sector…that’s the very definition of a bubble – a whole business sector not paying enough attention to costs.

Now the blogosphere is lit up with comments about “disruptive innovation” in the recruiting world.  Most of the comments are about technology and social media, but the same market forces apply to search firms.  One of the most thoughtful is David Manaster’s ERE post – (R)evolution.  In another must-read article, John Sumser bluntly counsels that HR “should be hammering its vendors for cost reductions.  Get the same for less money.”  John refers to a brilliant article in The Economist about the flip-side of Moore’s Law:

“Suddenly there is more interest in products that…provide a particular level of performance at an ever-lower price.”

Here is the problem.  The big firms did not reduce their cost of delivering service in the last recession.  They just cut staff.   When the market rebounded, they simply restaffed and found a new market for the same old services.   That’s not going to work this time.  Someone is going to find a faster, better way to deliver sophisticated search services for far less than 30% of salary.   Thousands of entrepreneurs are working on it, and you can be sure somebody will find a way.  (I think Staffing Advisors is making some fine progress, but admittedly, we are still a small firm in a relatively healthy job market).

BusinessWeek ran a great article about how recessions spur disruptive innovation, as did Wharton Business School.   Little known fact:  some of the most successful companies in America started during the Great Depression.  Here’s a quote from the BusinessWeek article:

“Economic downturns can have positive effects; they force companies to increase their efficiency, cut waste, and strive to do things in smarter ways.”

Since the last recession, we have relentlessly worked on eliminating costs, while hiring people with the business acumen and management skills to deliver a reliable, consistent search process.    As a result of our dogged research, I wrote a post a few days ago about obsolete business practices in search firms.    Well, as you might imagine, some old-school recruiting industry folks were pretty upset with me about that – they considered it industry bashing.   No surprise.  As Upton Sinclair famously observed,  “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”  

How about you, what are you doing to innovate your way out of this recession?

8 Responses to Search Firms Must Innovate, But Will They?

  1. [...] Search Firms Must Innovate, But Will They? How are you innovating your way out of the recession?   [...]

  2. Pete Radloff says:

    They likely won’t innovate. They are peppering HR departments with calls because business is bad for them right now. They are also finding every way to get around the proper channels of the organization. (calling managers directly, after being asked not to, etc.)

    At this point, we’re screening every call because we get about 15 calls per recruiter per day from agencies. None, and I mean NONE of these agencies do any homework on the company, yet they all have the “perfect” candidate for a role they see on our site, without gathering additional information on the position. And amazingly, they have all “worked with us in the past” (riiiight)

    What they fundamentally don’t get, is that if they had spent time when the market was booming, to develop relationships and trust with us, we’d be calling THEM now. Alas, they are just still slinging resumes over the fence, trying to make spread dollars, and perpetuating the view of agencies as nuisance.

  3. Bob Corlett says:

    Pete,
    While many search professionals would never act this way, the “noisy, desperate few” create alot of animosity before they finally flame out and leave the business.

    In my “Recruiting Myths” post I mentioned a great comment I saw from Josh Letourneau about “Big-Box Publicly Traded Candidate-Grinders” and you provide a fine example of the “service” provided by these folks. Color me naive, but I’m surprised that so many well recognized (not well respected) brands encourage this kind of brand destroying behavior…admittedly they must acquire some new business this way, but at what cost?

  4. [...] new business models gain traction in the market.  (For that very reason, I’ve argued that search firms must innovate their way out of this [...]

  5. [...] But they are wrong. Search firms cannot cold call their way out of this downturn  – they need to innovate their way out – finding more cost-effective ways to deliver service, just like everyone [...]

  6. [...] an astonishing admission, although, of course, I’ve been saying it for quite some time, here, here and [...]

  7. [...] to start paying attention.  (This is why recessions spur innovation). Jeff was asking me why more search firms haven’t made similar innovations to cut costs and improve service.   He said there is a huge market of CEO’s he knows [...]

  8. Tierd Recruiter says:

    I have been a recruiter for a couple of years now. I am getting tierd it is very hard work. Yes my boss and some of his Sr. level recruiters swear by passive calling. The argument is “every recruiter on the planet has access to the job boards, so, this means that it can be hard to find a candidate that has not already been marketed. This means that the hiring company has probably already seen the candidates resume and will turn it down because of this” So, my boss says when you get a passive candidate that candidate is all yours.,Meaning that you have a fresh candidate to present to your client companies. I understand this but, I have never had any luck with a passive call. Even if I do get someone to talk to me about other employment opportunity and I get all of their information then I need their resume. I will get their email address and request their resume. These passives always say they will send it but rarely do. I am considering getting out of the business but I keep telling myself that it will get better. When business is good in recruiting it is good pay and very rewarding, but when nothing seems to be happening after so much effort it seems I am wasteing my time. I work on commission only for placmeents so if I don’t make a placement I don’t get paid. Sign me tierd but still trying.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers

%d bloggers like this: